BRINGING TOGETHER A NETWORK OF ORGANISATIONS
FROM SEVEN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
Best Practice 1
Immediate Theory-Practice Feedback
On-the-job Exercises, Real Cases
This best practice links theoretical knowledge with practical application through real cases and exercises. Learners observe results and receive immediate feedback.
This best practice integrates real industrial cases and world examples into training to contextualize theory. Learners enhance engagement and understanding by aligning their skills with industry practices.
This best practice links training providers, research institutions, and industry partners to co-develop and deliver specialized programs. Learners benefit from AILEEN ecosystem shared resources and practical expertise.
This best practice links continuous feedback collection with systematic evaluation to fine-tune training programs. Learners experience content that is strictly aligned with evolving industry needs and technological developments.
Category: Learning Methods
Method: On-the-job exercises, real cases
This best practice focuses on directly linking theoretical knowledge with practical
application, enabling learners to immediately observe cause-and-effect relationships.
It ensures that learning is reinforced through hands-on experience, leading to deeper
understanding, higher engagement, and improved practical competence.
CoVEs Use Cases:
Macro-etching is used as a practical method to directly link theoretical knowledge
with real welding outcomes. By analysing weld cross-sections, learners immediately
understand how parameter changes affect quality and process robustness.
Methods used in Macro-Etching:
Direct integration of theoretical knowledge and practical application.
Immediate feedback through real-time observation of process outcomes.
Use of simplified, in-house verification methods.
Focus on understanding complex parameter interactions.
Visualisation of results to support experiential learning.
Emphasis on process robustness and practical optimisation.
Use Case: Macro-Etching for Immediate Feedback (BIL)
Reference: Belgian CoVE:
This structured training event combines theory, hands-on practice, and assessment
within a single learning experience, enabling participants to immediately apply
and validate their knowledge.
Integration of theory, practice, and assessment within structured learning formats.
Use of hands-on activities in laboratory and real-world environments.
Application of real industrial processes and technologies in training.
Active learner involvement through interactive and collaborative formats.
Combination of learning, application, and evaluation in a single training setting.
Use of competitive and reflective elements to reinforce learning outcomes.
Agenda: German League of Advanced Manufacturing Inspection
Use Case: German League of Advanced Manufacturing Inspection (LAK)
Category: Learning Methods
Method: Real Industry Cases, Group Projects
This best practice focuses on integrating real industrial cases into training
to enhance the relevance and applicability of learning content. It ensures that
theoretical knowledge is contextualised through real‑world examples, improving
learner engagement, practical understanding, and alignment with current industry
practices.
CoVEs Use Cases:
Real industrial projects are systematically integrated into training to
enhance relevance and practical understanding. Examples from sectors such
as aerospace or process optimisation are used to illustrate real‑world
challenges and solutions.
In addition, challenge‑based learning formats are applied outside formal
training programmes. In summer schools, participants work in teams on
real additive manufacturing business cases and present their results to
a jury.
Reference: Spanish CoVE:
Training is closely connected to real company environments, ensuring a
high level of practical relevance. This strong integration of real‑world
contexts supports the transfer of knowledge and skills into professional
practice.
Reference: Denmark CoVE:
Collaborative Networking & Industry Partnership:
Category: Networking
Method: University & Company Collaboration
This best practice focuses on establishing structured collaboration between training
providers, research institutions, and industry partners to jointly develop and deliver
training programmes. It ensures that training remains aligned with industry needs,
integrates practical expertise, and benefits from shared resources and complementary
competencies within the AILEEN ecosystem.
CoVEs Use Cases:
Training programmes are developed through close collaboration between research
institutions, technology centres, and training providers. The combination of
complementary expertise and shared infrastructure enables highly practical and
industry-relevant learning formats.
Methods used:
Collaboration model: Strategic partnership between research, technology, and training organisations.
Role structure: Clear division of responsibilities across complementary partners.
Development approach: Joint development of training programmes within collaborative initiatives.
Resources & infrastructure: Shared use of laboratories, equipment, and technical expertise.
Training delivery: Practice-oriented learning formats aligned with industrial applications.
Sustainability: Evolution from project-based cooperation to long-term partnership.
Collaboration is embedded within an international qualification and certification
system, enabling joint development, delivery, and recognition of training programmes.
Clearly defined roles and standardised processes ensure consistency, quality, and
comparability.
Methods used:
Collaboration model: Cooperation within structured qualification and certification frameworks.
Role structure: Defined roles between training delivery and certification functions.
Development approach: Training programmes developed in alignment with international standards.
Resources & systems: Use of established qualification frameworks and certification processes.
Training delivery: Standardised training with recognised learning outcomes and assessment.
Sustainability: Long-term cooperation through shared systems and continuous alignment.
Participation in European and national initiatives supports the co-development
and continuous improvement of training programmes. Project results and skills
intelligence are integrated into training provision, ensuring long-term relevance
and alignment with industry developments.
Methods used in Training Development:
Collaboration model: Integration into European and national innovation ecosystems.
Role structure: Combination of training provider role with project and accreditation functions.
Development approach: Co-development of training programmes within funded initiatives.
Resources & systems: Use of skills intelligence (e.g. observatories) and project outputs.
Training delivery: Joint delivery and certification of industry-relevant training programmes.
Sustainability: Embedding training into institutional catalogues and long-term initiatives.
This best practice focuses on continuously improving training programmes
through structured feedback collection, systematic evaluation, and iterative
updates. It ensures that training remains aligned with industry needs, learner
expectations, and technological developments within the AILEEN ecosystem.
CoVEs Use Cases:
A structured feedback system is used to continuously refine training
programmes. Input from participants and industry is systematically
collected, evaluated, and translated into concrete improvement measures.
Methods used:
Continuous refinement of training modules based on real-world application.
Strong integration of industry tools and standards.
Use of AR simulators and physical sample boxes for hands-on learning.
Reference: Belgian CoVE:
Participant feedback plays a central role in adapting training content,
methods, and level of depth. A strong focus on hands-on learning ensures
that feedback is directly linked to practical experience and learner needs.
Methods:
Strong focus on participant feedback and hands-on learning.
Continuous adjustment of training depth and focus.
Structure Process for Feedback Questionnaire (LAK).
Structured evaluation processes are used to monitor training quality and inform
continuous programme development. Feedback is collected through formal mechanisms
and applied to both programme updates and the creation of new training offers.
Methods used:
Structured evaluation system covering learning, trainers, and programme quality.
Continuous development of new training programmes.